<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Jackson Is Going To Be Homeless.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hilaryshepherd.com/rantsnraves/2008/02/28/michael-jackson-neverland-ranch-foreclosure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hilaryshepherd.com/rantsnraves/2008/02/28/michael-jackson-neverland-ranch-foreclosure/</link>
	<description>Hollywood Gossip Celeb Gossip Celebrity Rumors Celebrity Gossip</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: JCW</title>
		<link>http://www.hilaryshepherd.com/rantsnraves/2008/02/28/michael-jackson-neverland-ranch-foreclosure/#comment-93308</link>
		<dc:creator>JCW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hilaryshepherd.com/rantsnraves/2008/02/28/michael-jackson-is-going-to-be-homeless/#comment-93308</guid>
		<description>As of today, reports are surfacing that he is finding a way of raising the needed funds to keep the ranch.

What's strange to me is the idea that he only needs to raise 24+ Mil. From what I understand he owns something in the realm of 1000+ acres. You'd think he could sell off property and keep the homestead.

All that said.... it's a nasty property - who'd want to live there? Too much bad mojo... Even if you kept the main residences, who want's to deal with either the tear-down or up-keep of all the attractions?

From a finanacial standpoint, it would seem he's been living beyond his means for at least 20 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of today, reports are surfacing that he is finding a way of raising the needed funds to keep the ranch.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s strange to me is the idea that he only needs to raise 24+ Mil. From what I understand he owns something in the realm of 1000+ acres. You&#8217;d think he could sell off property and keep the homestead.</p>
<p>All that said&#8230;. it&#8217;s a nasty property &#8211; who&#8217;d want to live there? Too much bad mojo&#8230; Even if you kept the main residences, who want&#8217;s to deal with either the tear-down or up-keep of all the attractions?</p>
<p>From a finanacial standpoint, it would seem he&#8217;s been living beyond his means for at least 20 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
