<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Jackson Is Going To Be Homeless.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hilaryshepherd.com/rantsnraves/2008/02/28/michael-jackson-neverland-ranch-foreclosure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hilaryshepherd.com/rantsnraves/2008/02/28/michael-jackson-neverland-ranch-foreclosure/</link>
	<description>Hollywood Gossip Celebrity Rumors Celebrity Gossip</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:49:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandy</title>
		<link>http://www.hilaryshepherd.com/rantsnraves/2008/02/28/michael-jackson-neverland-ranch-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-291240</link>
		<dc:creator>sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hilaryshepherd.com/rantsnraves/2008/02/28/michael-jackson-is-going-to-be-homeless/#comment-291240</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re evil and are part of the reason that a beautiful soul, Michael Jackson is dead at 50. I wish you all of the heartache that Michael endured and more.  Michael was too good for this world.   If there is an upside to Michael&#039;s death it would be that he can no longer be affected by the likes of you or others like you.  

Michael is where he belongs among the meek and gentle, the angels.  I guess God knew that Michael could not endure anymore of the public criticism.

How do you put your head on the pillow at night?  I guess devils sleep well.

May God Bless You Michael and RIP.  You are not alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re evil and are part of the reason that a beautiful soul, Michael Jackson is dead at 50. I wish you all of the heartache that Michael endured and more.  Michael was too good for this world.   If there is an upside to Michael&#8217;s death it would be that he can no longer be affected by the likes of you or others like you.  </p>
<p>Michael is where he belongs among the meek and gentle, the angels.  I guess God knew that Michael could not endure anymore of the public criticism.</p>
<p>How do you put your head on the pillow at night?  I guess devils sleep well.</p>
<p>May God Bless You Michael and RIP.  You are not alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JCW</title>
		<link>http://www.hilaryshepherd.com/rantsnraves/2008/02/28/michael-jackson-neverland-ranch-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-93308</link>
		<dc:creator>JCW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hilaryshepherd.com/rantsnraves/2008/02/28/michael-jackson-is-going-to-be-homeless/#comment-93308</guid>
		<description>As of today, reports are surfacing that he is finding a way of raising the needed funds to keep the ranch.

What&#039;s strange to me is the idea that he only needs to raise 24+ Mil. From what I understand he owns something in the realm of 1000+ acres. You&#039;d think he could sell off property and keep the homestead.

All that said.... it&#039;s a nasty property - who&#039;d want to live there? Too much bad mojo... Even if you kept the main residences, who want&#039;s to deal with either the tear-down or up-keep of all the attractions?

From a finanacial standpoint, it would seem he&#039;s been living beyond his means for at least 20 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of today, reports are surfacing that he is finding a way of raising the needed funds to keep the ranch.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s strange to me is the idea that he only needs to raise 24+ Mil. From what I understand he owns something in the realm of 1000+ acres. You&#8217;d think he could sell off property and keep the homestead.</p>
<p>All that said&#8230;. it&#8217;s a nasty property &#8211; who&#8217;d want to live there? Too much bad mojo&#8230; Even if you kept the main residences, who want&#8217;s to deal with either the tear-down or up-keep of all the attractions?</p>
<p>From a finanacial standpoint, it would seem he&#8217;s been living beyond his means for at least 20 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

